Abortion Rates Drop...

✌➬ · 01.17.2008, 12:46 AM

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews

terminal pharmacy · 01.17.2008, 12:48 AM

is adoption up?

✌➬ · 01.17.2008, 12:48 AM

Did you read it?

Savage Clone · 01.17.2008, 12:50 AM

I would hope that this would be a reflection of conception rates going down, personally.

And no, I didn't read it yet and this is a sarcastic kneejerk reaction blah blah blah.

terminal pharmacy · 01.17.2008, 12:51 AM

yes i read it, surgical abortions are down, but the stats don't seem to count ru486.........

✌➬ · 01.17.2008, 12:52 AM

I would like to think that too Savage. Hopefully it is more people using more contraceptives, than having kids.

jakeonguitar · 01.17.2008, 01:13 AM

Really, I don't care about abortion rates. Whether they're up or not, let the women do whatever the fuck they want to do.

But, keep abstinence-plus federally funded and teen pregnancy rates will continue to drop.

✌➬ · 01.17.2008, 01:14 AM

The flaw with abstinence only funded programs, is that they are deluding themselves on thinking that the other methods won't work. I say both should be in place, but without religion put in place.

jakeonguitar · 01.17.2008, 01:23 AM

1. Religion isn't in place. It hasn't been since 1993. It may seem that way with Christian churches backing the shit out of the funded programs, but per an AFLA settlement in 93, religious values and references aren't allowed in these programs.

2. Federally funded abstinence-only programs do not exist. It gets labeled as "abstinence-only" when actually it involves most aspects of abstinence-plus. Abstinence is truly the best way to prevent from pregnancy and STDs (no shit), but the federally funded programs do touch on other methods of protection.

✌➬ · 01.17.2008, 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swa(y)

i think it is so INTENSELY fucked up that we live in a world where people are so damned stupid that theres actually a need to teach the benefits of abstinence.

it should just be one of those little things dropped into sex ed. classes (which it is) "if ya have sex, theres a chance ya might get pregnant or contract some sort of disease"...and that just be the end of it.

people are just so damned weird.

People need more information than just a line in class.

✌➬ · 01.17.2008, 01:49 AM

You know how many myths do kids believe, on how to prevent diseases and pregnancy? Way too many, there needs to be a formal way to teach them.

jakeonguitar · 01.17.2008, 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ✌➬

You know how many myths do kids believe, on how to prevent diseases and pregnancy? Way too many, there needs to be a formal way to teach them.

Parents?

✌➬ · 01.17.2008, 01:52 AM

Yeah, but most parents don't want to talk about it. Also most are probably religious zealots to even mention sex. Also many parents themselves are bad at explaining this, where a professional or someone educated in it can explain it succinctly.

jakeonguitar · 01.17.2008, 01:59 AM

Well, I believe that "most parents being religious zealots" is a generality. Secondly, dads must have had balls to produce the kid, so chances are he still has them and should confront the kid about sex. What kind of example are parents setting if they can't/won't talk about it?

If a parent is bad at talking to his child about a subject that is publicized every day by the media and [some] arts, then how does he raise a kid in any other aspect of life?

✌➬ · 01.17.2008, 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jakeonguitar

Well, I believe that "most parents being religious zealots" is a generality. Secondly, dads must have had balls to produce the kid, so chances are he still has them and should confront the kid about sex. What kind of example are parents setting if they can't/won't talk about it?

If a parent is bad at talking to his child about a subject that is publicized every day by the media and [some] arts, then how does he raise a kid in any other aspect of life?

I have to kind of agree with you on that. Is just that most parents just tell them to refrain until marriage. Well I will leave it at that, have to go to bed soon.

SpectralJulianIsNotDead · 01.17.2008, 04:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Clone

I would hope that this would be a reflection of conception rates going down, personally.

And no, I didn't read it yet and this is a sarcastic kneejerk reaction blah blah blah.

agreed

!@#$%! · 01.17.2008, 04:18 AM

im wondering if UNWANTED BABIES are going up, and with it the crime rate 20 years from now.

01.17.2008, 12:46 AM	#1
✌➬ invito al cielo Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: ιλ Posts: 5,754	http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews __________________ We Kill Homosexuals!!!
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 12:48 AM	#2
terminal pharmacy invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Australia Posts: 3,358	is adoption up?
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 12:48 AM	#3
✌➬ invito al cielo Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: ιλ Posts: 5,754	Did you read it? __________________ We Kill Homosexuals!!!
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 12:50 AM	#4
Savage Clone invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 11,290	I would hope that this would be a reflection of conception rates going down, personally. And no, I didn't read it yet and this is a sarcastic kneejerk reaction blah blah blah.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 12:51 AM	#5
terminal pharmacy invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Australia Posts: 3,358	yes i read it, surgical abortions are down, but the stats don't seem to count ru486.........
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 12:52 AM	#6
✌➬ invito al cielo Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: ιλ Posts: 5,754	I would like to think that too Savage. Hopefully it is more people using more contraceptives, than having kids. __________________ We Kill Homosexuals!!!
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 01:13 AM	#7
jakeonguitar bad moon rising Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: California Posts: 181	Really, I don't care about abortion rates. Whether they're up or not, let the women do whatever the fuck they want to do. But, keep abstinence-plus federally funded and teen pregnancy rates will continue to drop. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 01:14 AM	#8
✌➬ invito al cielo Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: ιλ Posts: 5,754	The flaw with abstinence only funded programs, is that they are deluding themselves on thinking that the other methods won't work. I say both should be in place, but without religion put in place. __________________ We Kill Homosexuals!!!
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 01:23 AM	#9
jakeonguitar bad moon rising Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: California Posts: 181	1. Religion isn't in place. It hasn't been since 1993. It may seem that way with Christian churches backing the shit out of the funded programs, but per an AFLA settlement in 93, religious values and references aren't allowed in these programs. 2. Federally funded abstinence-only programs do not exist. It gets labeled as "abstinence-only" when actually it involves most aspects of abstinence-plus. Abstinence is truly the best way to prevent from pregnancy and STDs (no shit), but the federally funded programs do touch on other methods of protection. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 01:49 AM	#11
✌➬ invito al cielo Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: ιλ Posts: 5,754	You know how many myths do kids believe, on how to prevent diseases and pregnancy? Way too many, there needs to be a formal way to teach them. __________________ We Kill Homosexuals!!!
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 01:52 AM	#13
✌➬ invito al cielo Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: ιλ Posts: 5,754	Yeah, but most parents don't want to talk about it. Also most are probably religious zealots to even mention sex. Also many parents themselves are bad at explaining this, where a professional or someone educated in it can explain it succinctly. __________________ We Kill Homosexuals!!!
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 01:59 AM	#14
jakeonguitar bad moon rising Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: California Posts: 181	Well, I believe that "most parents being religious zealots" is a generality. Secondly, dads must have had balls to produce the kid, so chances are he still has them and should confront the kid about sex. What kind of example are parents setting if they can't/won't talk about it? If a parent is bad at talking to his child about a subject that is publicized every day by the media and [some] arts, then how does he raise a kid in any other aspect of life? __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.17.2008, 04:18 AM	#17
!@#$%! invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: mars attacks Posts: 42,564	im wondering if UNWANTED BABIES are going up, and with it the crime rate 20 years from now.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|