pitchfork has officially lost all credibility... - Page 7

atsonicpark · 04.11.2008, 10:00 AM

Porky, I don't understand the argument here either.

Rather, I don't understand why there's still any argument at all -- I said about 3 times that my definition of obscurity must be different than some people's. What else is there to argue about? As far as "underground" music goes, Animal Collective is really well-known. But they're still underground for now. That's all. Nothing else to say really.

atsonicpark · 04.11.2008, 10:02 AM

Hhahaa, I love all that early 90's college rock/alternative rock shit. I have a soft spot for it. Even a couple Bush songs... though the vocals are terrible.

04.11.2008, 10:02 AM

This thread is officially psychobabble.

Rob Instigator · 04.11.2008, 10:05 AM

possum dixon?

atsonicpark · 04.11.2008, 10:09 AM

Rob, let's never argue again. *hug*

atsonicpark · 04.11.2008, 10:11 AM

Make up your mind
Decide to walk with me
Around the lake tonight
Around the lake tonight
By my side
By my side
I'm not gonna lie
I'll not be a gentleman
Behind the boathouse
I'll show you my dark secret

I'm not gonna lie
I want you for mine
My blushing bride
My lover, be my lover, yeah...

Don't be afraid
I didn't mean to scare you
So help me, Jesus

I can promise you
You'll stay as beautiful
With dark hair
And soft skin...forever
Forever

Make up your mind
Make up your mind
And I'll promise you
I will treat you well
My sweet angel
So help me, Jesus

(hey, hey, hey)

Give it up to me
Give it up to me
Do you wanna be
My angel?
So help me!

Be my angel

Be my angel

Do you wanna die?

I promise you
I will treat you well
My sweet angel
So help me, Jesus

Jesus

Jesus

Jesus...

SYRFox · 04.11.2008, 10:12 AM

Is that white metal lyrics?

EDIT: okay I did some google search, ahah

Rob Instigator · 04.11.2008, 10:13 AM

It ain't no thing man! I used to think everyone knew about couch flambeaux

batreleaser · 04.11.2008, 11:00 AM

all this bitchin over me makin a thread over "pitchfork sucks", which is somethin i thought we could all agree on and love eachother over.

super_charger · 05.06.2008, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atsonicpark

And to agree with batreleaser's original point, you do have to wonder why they even bother covering something like the sun city girls. Or why they're reviewing those reissues of old albums instead of that NEW excellent singles collection that came out last month.

Looks like they finally got around to that singles collection, and gave it a pretty good review too...still a shit website though.

05.06.2008, 08:02 AM

Question:

If you guys think that it's a shit website, why do you read it?

atsonicpark · 05.06.2008, 08:30 AM

Better late than never, I guess, super_charger...

Toilet & Bowels · 05.06.2008, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarramkrop

Question:

If you guys think that it's a shit website, why do you read it?

why do the people who this question is directed at never answer it?

atsonicpark · 05.06.2008, 08:51 AM

I don't think anyone's had a chance to answer it yet. He just posted it.

If you're referring to me (?!), I don't read the site but I did years ago.

05.06.2008, 08:53 AM

I vaguely asked that earlier on this thread, I think. Anyway, why?

atsonic: Why do you seem so pissed off at their wrong-doing, then?

atsonicpark · 05.06.2008, 08:58 AM

I highly doubt I come off as more "pissed-off" about their wrongdoing than anything else I come off as pissed off about on this board. It's all meaingless anyway, we're just having a debate. Anyway, I'm not pissed-off, I'm merely contributing to a discussion.

But, as I explained earlier, I became irritated with their review style a long time ago, and I became sick of seeing their name, as if they're some credible source of music knowledge that can make or break any band with the press of a button. That's about it. I already talked earlier about how they give review scores based upon labels/bands paying them to do so, which you know, doesn't surprise me and is probably done everywhere by everyone, but -- really, there ARE people that truth pitchfork. Which is sad. But whatever.

Toilet & Bowels · 05.06.2008, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atsonicpark

I don't think anyone's had a chance to answer it yet. He just posted it.

If you're referring to me (?!), I don't read the site but I did years ago.

i wasn't refering to you, more just in general to when people gripe about pitchfork, which is something that happens sporadically, and then people ask "if you hate pitchfork so much why do you read it?", but for people who hate pitchfork the idea of not reading pitchfork is apparently incomprehensible.

05.06.2008, 09:03 AM

Sure, and what are you going to do about it?

Isn't pitchfork the easiest of targets, anyway?

I just don't get when people get agitated by reading something they disagree wih but carry on doing it because somehow it makes them feel important and ends up validating something about themselves, that's all.

I mean , there are people out there who can write well and write about interesting things, so why the fuck would anyone waste their time reading something that they consider to be crap, I don't get.

edit: astso

atsonicpark · 05.06.2008, 09:04 AM

Oh, okay, I thought you were referring to me since I had replied since he posted that.

Anyway... pitchfork rules. Pitchfork sucks. It's just a website. Net neutrality and all that.

05.06.2008, 09:06 AM

139 replies of pure neutrality. Hmmm.....

04.11.2008, 10:00 AM	#121
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Porky, I don't understand the argument here either. Rather, I don't understand why there's still any argument at all -- I said about 3 times that my definition of obscurity must be different than some people's. What else is there to argue about? As far as "underground" music goes, Animal Collective is really well-known. But they're still underground for now. That's all. Nothing else to say really. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

04.11.2008, 10:02 AM	#122
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Hhahaa, I love all that early 90's college rock/alternative rock shit. I have a soft spot for it. Even a couple Bush songs... though the vocals are terrible. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

04.11.2008, 10:02 AM	#123
sarramkrop Posts: n/a	This thread is officially psychobabble.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

04.11.2008, 10:05 AM	#124
Rob Instigator invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: In the land of the Instigator Posts: 27,974	possum dixon? __________________ RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

04.11.2008, 10:09 AM	#125
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Rob, let's never argue again. hug __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

04.11.2008, 10:11 AM	#126
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Make up your mind Decide to walk with me Around the lake tonight Around the lake tonight By my side By my side I'm not gonna lie I'll not be a gentleman Behind the boathouse I'll show you my dark secret I'm not gonna lie I want you for mine My blushing bride My lover, be my lover, yeah... Don't be afraid I didn't mean to scare you So help me, Jesus I can promise you You'll stay as beautiful With dark hair And soft skin...forever Forever Make up your mind Make up your mind And I'll promise you I will treat you well My sweet angel So help me, Jesus (hey, hey, hey) Give it up to me Give it up to me Do you wanna be My angel? So help me! Be my angel Be my angel Do you wanna die? I promise you I will treat you well My sweet angel So help me, Jesus Jesus Jesus Jesus... __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

04.11.2008, 10:12 AM	#127
SYRFox invito al cielo Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Paris Posts: 7,492	Is that white metal lyrics? EDIT: okay I did some google search, ahah
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

04.11.2008, 10:13 AM	#128
Rob Instigator invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: In the land of the Instigator Posts: 27,974	It ain't no thing man! I used to think everyone knew about couch flambeaux __________________ RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

04.11.2008, 11:00 AM	#129
batreleaser invito al cielo Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: New York, NY Posts: 5,155	all this bitchin over me makin a thread over "pitchfork sucks", which is somethin i thought we could all agree on and love eachother over. __________________ listen to pink reason
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.06.2008, 08:02 AM	#131
sarramkrop Posts: n/a	Question: If you guys think that it's a shit website, why do you read it?
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.06.2008, 08:30 AM	#132
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Better late than never, I guess, super_charger... __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.06.2008, 08:51 AM	#134
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	I don't think anyone's had a chance to answer it yet. He just posted it. If you're referring to me (?!), I don't read the site but I did years ago. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.06.2008, 08:53 AM	#135
sarramkrop Posts: n/a	I vaguely asked that earlier on this thread, I think. Anyway, why? atsonic: Why do you seem so pissed off at their wrong-doing, then?
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.06.2008, 08:58 AM	#136
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	I highly doubt I come off as more "pissed-off" about their wrongdoing than anything else I come off as pissed off about on this board. It's all meaingless anyway, we're just having a debate. Anyway, I'm not pissed-off, I'm merely contributing to a discussion. But, as I explained earlier, I became irritated with their review style a long time ago, and I became sick of seeing their name, as if they're some credible source of music knowledge that can make or break any band with the press of a button. That's about it. I already talked earlier about how they give review scores based upon labels/bands paying them to do so, which you know, doesn't surprise me and is probably done everywhere by everyone, but -- really, there ARE people that truth pitchfork. Which is sad. But whatever. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.06.2008, 09:03 AM	#138
sarramkrop Posts: n/a	Sure, and what are you going to do about it? Isn't pitchfork the easiest of targets, anyway? I just don't get when people get agitated by reading something they disagree wih but carry on doing it because somehow it makes them feel important and ends up validating something about themselves, that's all. I mean , there are people out there who can write well and write about interesting things, so why the fuck would anyone waste their time reading something that they consider to be crap, I don't get. edit: astso
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.06.2008, 09:04 AM	#139
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Oh, okay, I thought you were referring to me since I had replied since he posted that. Anyway... pitchfork rules. Pitchfork sucks. It's just a website. Net neutrality and all that. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.06.2008, 09:06 AM	#140
sarramkrop Posts: n/a	139 replies of pure neutrality. Hmmm.....
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|