Hillary, I hate you now - Page 3

!@#$%! · 01.22.2008, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jennthebenn

there's 3 things i've learned never to discuss over the internet: politics,
religion, and the Great Pumpkin.

how dare you utter the name of the Great Pumpkin????

jennthebenn · 01.22.2008, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

how dare you utter the name of the Great Pumpkin????

you get a rock.

Cantankerous · 01.22.2008, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Everyneurotic

hillary is an idiot, obama is a smug idiot, edwards is a retard, romney is a retard, huckabee is a moron, mccain is an egotistical asshole who loves to hear his own voice and giulianni is a nazi.

fuck the u.s., fuck democracy.

hahahahaha

read that as an especially punctuated maniacal laugh, with the "A" in each ha really emphasized.

floatingslowly · 01.22.2008, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Everyneurotic

fuck the u.s., fuck democracy.

do you own a black beret like glice's?

Everyneurotic · 01.22.2008, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

cmon, let's not start this again

i'd fuck democracy if she had a warm wet hole, but it being a concept, it's hard to accomplish.

in mexico, to get sworn in you have to extent your right arm, instead how you yanks have to put your hand over your right breast.

you probably can find a picture of a bunch of 3rd grade kids extending their arms and think "ohh my!! fascist kids!!".

and yeah, i should have thrown in "fuck communism and fuck fascism" in there too.

but i definitely agree, let's not go there again.

m1rr0r dash · 01.22.2008, 09:39 PM

liberty is definitely the hottest of the three sisters... rumor has it fraternity was born without a warm wet hole, later corrected by surgery... supposedly that was why democracy gave her a feminine name that had a masculine meaning, ... like jamie... or lee.

american liberty is plainer and more proper, she would never pose topless for delacroix or spread her warm wet hole for !@#$%!...

...although here she is spanking george bush... i don't think it's kinky though, i think he might have done something wrong...

!@#$%! · 01.22.2008, 10:16 PM

yes i was gonna start on with la france, but a client came over.

here is la france herself.

that, ladies and gentlemen. is HOTT. france rules.

LifeDistortion · 01.22.2008, 10:48 PM

Well if Democrates were so serious about winning this election they would get smart and vote for Edwards. If you think states like Nebraska or Wyoming or going to vote for Hillary or Obama, you have more faith in the people of this country then I do.

Cantankerous · 01.22.2008, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jennthebenn

you get a rock.

hahaha
i about pissed when i saw that

!@#$%! · 01.22.2008, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LifeDistortion

Well if Democrates were so serious about winning this election they would get smart and vote for Edwards. If you think states like Nebraska or Wyoming or going to vote for Hillary or Obama, you have more faith in the people of this country then I do.

funny you should mention those states. how many electoral votes get those? moreover, nebraska splits their votes by congressional district.

anyway, obama can win. would be nice to have a decent person in the white house for a change-- he's far from perfect, but at least he's not some creepy multimillionaire corporate shill.

!@#$%! · 01.22.2008, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jennthebenn

you get a rock.

i laughed so hard when i saw this my original answer self-destructed.

atari 2600 · 01.22.2008, 11:15 PM

Only one candidate, John Edwards, has made a promise to bring the troops home within his first year in office.
Ending the occupation of Iraq (where we are hemorrhaging debt at the rate of two billion a week or so) is paramount to getting this economy under some semblance of manageability.
John Edwards is on Late Night with David Letterman tonight. (Diablo Cody is another guest; Josh Ritter is the musical guest).

Edwards, Obama, and Clinton all voted for the illegal Iraq invasion and all three have, in effect, recanted that vote. However, if the foreign policy of each is probed, only one of three, again, John Edwards, is actually against the current occupation. Essentially, Obama and Clinton are straddling the fence on the war.

The only two candidates that have refused to take political action committee campaign contributions are Edwards and Obama. On the other hand, Hillary has accepted more contributions than any other candidate running, be they Democrat or Republican.
Hillary is a crook just like her intelligent and charming husband, Bill. She cannot be trusted. And I'm stating this, relatively, you know, since politicians cannot be trusted in general.

As far as I can tell, none of the Republican candidates can be trusted to do a competent job either. Another person that probably, in the end, in these horribly turbulent times, that cannot be trusted is Barack Obama. Take this however you want to, and I agree with gmku's observations, but the last thing we need is another president who, like our current one, has had a documented history with cocaine abuse.

!@#$%! · 01.22.2008, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atari 2600

but the last thing we need is another president that has had a documented history with cocaine abuse.

scuse me, but who in america has never, ever taken drugs?

oh yeah. let's vote for them.

(obama has had the decency to speak openly of his past. he did inhale. if that honesty is not a plus, what is?)

besides-- he was in highschool.

atari 2600 · 01.22.2008, 11:25 PM

When the media starts making it known that his middle name as "Hussein," it's all over for Obama anyway. The Republicans are saving that little nugget for a rainy day.

!@#$%! · 01.22.2008, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atari 2600

When the media starts making it known that his middle name as "Hussein," it's all over for Obama anyway. The Republicans are saving that little nugget for a rainy day.

only a bigoted jackass would not vote for someone because of their middle name, but yes, there are plenty of bigoted jackasses with a voter registration card.

i thought this was a well-known fact already, but i don't know about readers of the new york post.

atari 2600 · 01.22.2008, 11:29 PM

Sorry, didn't mean do disrupt you ever-so-intelligent "hate" thread.

By all means, as you were...

continue...

atari 2600 · 01.22.2008, 11:33 PM

Originally Posted by jennthebenn
there's 3 things i've learned never to discuss over the internet: politics,
religion, and the Great Pumpkin.

I can see how people may avoid these topics in certain social situations, but I fail to see why those areas of discourse are similarly considered trepadatious online.

!@#$%! · 01.22.2008, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atari 2600

Originally Posted by jennthebenn
there's 3 things i've learned never to discuss over the internet: politics,
religion, and the Great Pumpkin.

I can see how people may avoid these topics in certain social situations, but I fail to see why those areas of discourse are similarly considered trepadatious online.

especially the great pumpkin.

!@#$%! · 01.23.2008, 12:26 AM

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...d=opinionsbox1

atari 2600 · 01.23.2008, 12:36 AM

I give Ruth Marcus a C, for average research and average writing.

Ruthie seems to cast a pall over Edwards' plan to increase "green collar jobs." One area being looked at is wind farms and the widespread building of wind-turbines. Another area being looked at is pushing solar power conversion with economic incentives like other countries have encouraged.

In the case of our current economic crisis, short-term plans proposed by many other Candidates aren't realistic. But if you don't think that Edwards will try to tax the living fuck out of the super-wealthy, then you don't know a thing about Edwards, someone who is refusing PAC money based on his priniciples. And if you're someone that can't appreciate that, then you're also someone who cares less about real life and death issues than you do about some silly, farcical, media political soap opera.

01.22.2008, 09:39 PM	#46
m1rr0r dash invito al cielo Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: atari Posts: 2,228	liberty is definitely the hottest of the three sisters... rumor has it fraternity was born without a warm wet hole, later corrected by surgery... supposedly that was why democracy gave her a feminine name that had a masculine meaning, ... like jamie... or lee. american liberty is plainer and more proper, she would never pose topless for delacroix or spread her warm wet hole for !@#$%!... ...although here she is spanking george bush... i don't think it's kinky though, i think he might have done something wrong... __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.22.2008, 10:16 PM	#47
!@#$%! invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: mars attacks Posts: 42,564	yes i was gonna start on with la france, but a client came over. here is la france herself. that, ladies and gentlemen. is HOTT. france rules.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.22.2008, 10:48 PM	#48
LifeDistortion expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: CA Posts: 2,457	Well if Democrates were so serious about winning this election they would get smart and vote for Edwards. If you think states like Nebraska or Wyoming or going to vote for Hillary or Obama, you have more faith in the people of this country then I do.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.22.2008, 11:15 PM	#52
atari 2600 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 8,212	Only one candidate, John Edwards, has made a promise to bring the troops home within his first year in office. Ending the occupation of Iraq (where we are hemorrhaging debt at the rate of two billion a week or so) is paramount to getting this economy under some semblance of manageability. John Edwards is on Late Night with David Letterman tonight. (Diablo Cody is another guest; Josh Ritter is the musical guest). Edwards, Obama, and Clinton all voted for the illegal Iraq invasion and all three have, in effect, recanted that vote. However, if the foreign policy of each is probed, only one of three, again, John Edwards, is actually against the current occupation. Essentially, Obama and Clinton are straddling the fence on the war. The only two candidates that have refused to take political action committee campaign contributions are Edwards and Obama. On the other hand, Hillary has accepted more contributions than any other candidate running, be they Democrat or Republican. Hillary is a crook just like her intelligent and charming husband, Bill. She cannot be trusted. And I'm stating this, relatively, you know, since politicians cannot be trusted in general. As far as I can tell, none of the Republican candidates can be trusted to do a competent job either. Another person that probably, in the end, in these horribly turbulent times, that cannot be trusted is Barack Obama. Take this however you want to, and I agree with gmku's observations, but the last thing we need is another president who, like our current one, has had a documented history with cocaine abuse.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.22.2008, 11:25 PM	#54
atari 2600 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 8,212	When the media starts making it known that his middle name as "Hussein," it's all over for Obama anyway. The Republicans are saving that little nugget for a rainy day.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.22.2008, 11:29 PM	#56
atari 2600 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 8,212	Sorry, didn't mean do disrupt you ever-so-intelligent "hate" thread. By all means, as you were... continue...
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.22.2008, 11:33 PM	#57
atari 2600 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 8,212	Originally Posted by jennthebenn there's 3 things i've learned never to discuss over the internet: politics, religion, and the Great Pumpkin. I can see how people may avoid these topics in certain social situations, but I fail to see why those areas of discourse are similarly considered trepadatious online.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.23.2008, 12:26 AM	#59
!@#$%! invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: mars attacks Posts: 42,564	http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...d=opinionsbox1
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

01.23.2008, 12:36 AM	#60
atari 2600 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 8,212	I give Ruth Marcus a C, for average research and average writing. Ruthie seems to cast a pall over Edwards' plan to increase "green collar jobs." One area being looked at is wind farms and the widespread building of wind-turbines. Another area being looked at is pushing solar power conversion with economic incentives like other countries have encouraged. In the case of our current economic crisis, short-term plans proposed by many other Candidates aren't realistic. But if you don't think that Edwards will try to tax the living fuck out of the super-wealthy, then you don't know a thing about Edwards, someone who is refusing PAC money based on his priniciples. And if you're someone that can't appreciate that, then you're also someone who cares less about real life and death issues than you do about some silly, farcical, media political soap opera.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|