|
View Poll Results: Should Pete Doherty Go To Jail? | |||
Yes | 10 | 62.50% | |
No | 6 | 37.50% | |
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
07.04.2007, 03:39 AM | #21 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,662
|
Throw the loser in prison. We'll see how rock and roll he feels when some of the hornier prisoners try to give him a good seeing to.
__________________
Snow on Easter Sunday - Jesus Christ in reverse. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 03:41 AM | #22 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,527
|
Why do I get the feeling that you're going to go on a very unsubtle shoplifting spree as soon as Doherty's prison sentence is imminent?
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 03:47 AM | #23 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SoKo
Posts: 10,621
|
I've never really listened to either of his bands and I find Kate Moss to be rather average looking.
Thrown in jail, die of an overdose... whichever. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 03:50 AM | #24 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,662
|
Quote:
It's a kleptogay thing. What's good enough for Winona Ryder is etc etc. EDIT: Me? Buggering Pete Doherty? With my reputation?
__________________
Snow on Easter Sunday - Jesus Christ in reverse. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 06:15 AM | #25 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Plaza de Toros
Posts: 6,731
|
I wonder what the poll results would show if this thread was "Should Drug Addicts Go To Jail"?
This is specifically about Pete Doherty, isn't it? Banish me. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 06:20 AM | #26 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: psycho battery
Posts: 12,161
|
i think its just the fact that he seems to get away with a lot because of his fame. if he where not famous he would have been inside long ago.
__________________
Sarcasm[A] is stating the opposite of an intended meaning especially in order to sneeringly, slyly, jest or mock a person, situation or thing |@ <------- Euphoric brain cell just moments before expiration V _ \ / _ PING <-------- moments later / \ http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljhxq...isruo1_500.gif |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 06:32 AM | #27 | |
stalker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
I agree with jon Boy, its the leniency and lattitude the courts have shown to this person, not the fact he is a drug addict per se He has been released on bail and everytime has gone on to commit further offences Your average person in the street, for doing the same thing, would have their bail revoked so fast it would make their head spin Sending addicts to jail serves little purpose as drugs are actually easier to get inside and they are still addicts upon release This guy has had the opportunity on numerous occasions to take advantage of rehab, opportunities most other addicts never get, and has wasted them Let him rot in jail |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 06:50 AM | #28 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Plaza de Toros
Posts: 6,731
|
Like I said before, I couldn't give two shits about this person, but are we to incarcerate a junkie for his habit, or blame the rehab centre he was put into for not being able to help him successfully? Wouldn't it just be easier to legalize all drugs? Junkies that are too far down the road to turn back should be able to get a prescribed dose per day. Crime levels would drop, and if you don't believe me, check out our way of dealing with it in a city like Rotterdam.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 06:54 AM | #29 |
Posts: n/a
|
Yeah, but then people would start sniffing smelly shoes instead.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 06:56 AM | #30 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: psycho battery
Posts: 12,161
|
thing is though he never stays at rehab he always leaves and goes on to do something else and the judge, soely based on his fame alone (he did mention this when sentencing him) let him go.
i understand what you mean about the lack of resources and poor quality medicare but if he had not written a lot of crap pub sing along songs he would slopping out with everyone else in wandsworth.
__________________
Sarcasm[A] is stating the opposite of an intended meaning especially in order to sneeringly, slyly, jest or mock a person, situation or thing |@ <------- Euphoric brain cell just moments before expiration V _ \ / _ PING <-------- moments later / \ http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljhxq...isruo1_500.gif |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 06:58 AM | #31 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: banana boat
Posts: 15,570
|
I think he's "out" also because he can afford to pay big fines/bail bonds (is this the right term?) with lotsa cash, not just because he's famous.
__________________
11:11 11-11-11 I Ascended. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 07:25 AM | #32 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,527
|
He (or his record company) can afford to pay for the sort of lawyers that are usually busy getting business tycoons and politicians off charges of corruption.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 07:57 AM | #33 | |
stalker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
There is also proof that many junkies who are prescribed regular doses still top up with illegal drugs Also, if I remember correctly, didn't the overall addict figures go up in Holland despite prescription drugs? |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.04.2007, 08:47 AM | #34 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Plaza de Toros
Posts: 6,731
|
The overall addict figures did go up a little, but never reached the levels everyone had first predicted they would.
Besides, what pisses people off, isn't the fact that someone takes drugs. That's their own business, and most couldn't care less. It's the things they do to obtain them that makes it an issue. Burglaries, muggings, etc. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |