07.02.2007, 11:00 PM | #1 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
I hated this one so much at first I almost took it back. Then I fell head over heels on the fourth listen or so. One of those albums that casts a spell.
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:04 PM | #2 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the party
Posts: 10,281
|
yes!
great album |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:07 PM | #3 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,290
|
T O O
S O O N |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:09 PM | #4 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
No, it's NOT! You don't get to dictate time. A classic is a classic outside of time, whether it was made yesterday or 50 years ago.
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:14 PM | #5 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,290
|
20 year minimum. Arbitrary? Sure, but I don't give a shit.
"Classic" is a term that can only be applied after a good amount of time in order for the art to be contextualized as it relates to both typifying a moment in time and having staying power and/or influence. Too Soon. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:15 PM | #6 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
Meh, I don't buy it. Sorry.
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:18 PM | #7 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,290
|
I would think you of all people would understand that just because something is (in your opinion) really good, that doesn't make it a "classic" automatically.
Classic is a term that requires a frame of reference. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:19 PM | #8 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the party
Posts: 10,281
|
did someone just get served?
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:24 PM | #9 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
I don't know, but I'm either punchy from being up too long or this truly is like the silliest debate I've ever been involved in. Truly. So fine, I'll concede. 20 years, Savage Clone. Whatever you say.
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:25 PM | #10 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the party
Posts: 10,281
|
yo,
whathcoodoin' dawg? you aint neva supposed to give up hollaaaa |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:26 PM | #11 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,290
|
Well, if nothing else it's nice to know that you can repackage prog-rock, pretend it isn't prog-rock, play your sidelong crescendos in the dark and berate your standing-room-only crowd (who obviously love you) for the actions of a president that maybe two people in the room may have voted for, and have your work be deemed an "instant classic."
I don't think it's silly. I mean, it's silly to get super worked-up over it, but I don't think either of us is actually angry for real. There are roots and there are branches. Time will tell. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:29 PM | #12 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
I think it's a contemporary classic. How's that?
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:30 PM | #13 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
Quote:
Well, the doc says I have to watch my blood pressure.
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:33 PM | #14 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,290
|
Seriously, with things like presidential legacies and matters of historical importance, it is widely acknowledged that a significant amount of time must pass before the effects of a certain administration, movement or event can be truly put into historical perspective. I'm only trying to apply that prism to significant works of art, that's all. Just because something is "Really Good" now does not mean it will age well or have lasting impact, or have any significance in the lives of people who were not of its time. That, to me, is what a "classic" is.
"Contemporary classic" is an OK term, but it sounds like a word a publicist would like to use... |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:34 PM | #15 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
I do think some things attain classic status more quickly than others, depending on their significance and so on.
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:39 PM | #16 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the party
Posts: 10,281
|
question
is this old enough to be deemed a classic? |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:39 PM | #17 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
Are you making fun of us?
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.02.2007, 11:42 PM | #18 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the party
Posts: 10,281
|
no.
...yes. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.03.2007, 09:11 AM | #19 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 28,843
|
yanqui xo is my favorite godspeed.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.03.2007, 10:27 AM | #20 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,308
|
This is indeed a great Godspeed record, but i would say 'f#a#' is their 'classic' album.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |