06.03.2015, 07:57 AM | #1 |
children of satan
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 393
|
Ok, if you were stranded on a desert island for life and could ONLY pick between having Goo + Dirty versus A Thousand Leaves + NYCG&F with you, which pair would you take?
For me it would be Goo + Dirty hands down. How about you? |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.03.2015, 11:47 AM | #2 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,019
|
Really hard decision. But I think I will take ATL & NYCG&F, just because I think ATL is one of the greatest SY-Records, so I think I will have longer time fun with those two. Even I really love also Goo & Dirty, I think I will get bored them earlier than those other two.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.03.2015, 02:08 PM | #3 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,131
|
goo + dirty
i'm looking forward for some funny comments...about to be stuck on the desert island. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.03.2015, 04:02 PM | #4 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 12,268
|
Dirty and Goo
But why only those choices? |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.03.2015, 04:22 PM | #5 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 2,457
|
I'd want to mix & match, probably a late 80's early 90's album with a late 90's early 2000's album. What if you could only listen to s/t and The Eternal and nothing in between?
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.04.2015, 06:19 AM | #6 | |
children of satan
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
In my time as a SY fan, both on and off these boards, I see a certain faction of people devalue/under appreciate Goo + Dirty, while artificially propping up ATL + NYCG&F. Everyone's entitled to their own opinion and there's no accounting for taste, but I'll take Goo + Dirty over the others 10 out of 10 times. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.04.2015, 06:43 AM | #7 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,019
|
Well, I havenīt ever devalue Goo neither Dirty. Goo was my first Sonic record I heard, so it has a special place in my heart. And it sounds still as great as then. Dirty was first I heard right after it came, so it is also very special to me still.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.04.2015, 06:57 AM | #8 | |
children of satan
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
We got into SY at EXACTLY the same time! A friend let me borrow Goo for a few weeks and I got hooked! Dirty was the first SY release I actively looked forward to coming out and The Pretty Fucking Dirty Tour was the first time I saw them live (Boston, October 1992). Maybe all of this has something to do with my opinion/preference?? |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.04.2015, 10:09 AM | #9 | |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,019
|
Quote:
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.04.2015, 10:34 AM | #10 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 2,457
|
There is tendency to under-value Goo and Dirty and EJSTNS here I think because of their mainstream appeal. There are some who don't think those albums represent the band best, and were mostly made to aim for a wider fanbase at just the time when their kind of music which they had been playing for a good ten years was getting attention. There may be some truth to that opinion but I don't think it takes away the listenability of those albums.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.04.2015, 11:01 AM | #11 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,019
|
Quite soon after recording Dirty to cassette (also had recorded DDN which I borrowed from the library) I ordered my first Sonic vinyl, Sister. Found it also really great and quite soon that ordered EVOL, BMR & Sonic Death. Maybe Sister and specially EVOL are little bit more unconventional with their song structures as DDN, Goo & Dirty, but anyway I found them all sounding really same, Sonic Youth. BMR & Sonic Death sounded of course different, I think in BMR they almost find their own true sound. I liked those too already then. EJSTNS was at first disappointment to me, cause it has lack of melodic songs that are typical all the albums after BMR.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |