|
View Poll Results: You think some times or all the time or half or a meter... | |||
I'm Kant. | 0 | 0% | |
Cartesian blood mother fucker! | 0 | 0% | |
give me the old school, keep it platonic | 0 | 0% | |
new wave egyptian style moses | 1 | 14.29% | |
NEWTON NEWTON NEWTON | 0 | 0% | |
physical physics are overrated, let's apply them to fantasy | 2 | 28.57% | |
you sunk my no fuck you i had shields | 2 | 28.57% | |
i keep flowers around | 1 | 14.29% | |
dwell my thoughts scatter them amongst elderly abcessii | 1 | 14.29% | |
HUME | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
08.14.2009, 12:23 AM | #21 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SoKo
Posts: 10,621
|
Quote:
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.14.2009, 12:33 AM | #22 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,554
|
bottom line ... let's say decartes. he seemed to have explored as much as he could, through logic, and his conclusion was wrong in a logical sense. trace elements of subjectivity in his conclusion. but that conclusion is i think unavoidable at a universal level. one can exhaust a sound, logical path, until the last second. the throw on of "therefore I am" inherent subjectivity. it isn't just in thought either. and at the risk of jaunting way out of my league... fuckin' physics. is existence of the universe not dualistic? I thought all things were headed towards a black hole.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.14.2009, 04:59 PM | #23 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,554
|
so does this mean i beat the pb in a philosophical thread or does it mean that i'm way too stupid to be even throwing those curl routes?
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |