View Single Post
Old 03.22.2006, 02:39 PM   #22
truncated
invito al cielo
 
truncated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,607
truncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hip Priest
My opinions. Please do not assume that this list is in any way exhaustive. I'll just type 'till my fingers get too sore.

Part one: people who (supposedly) should not be bashed, but who are or were in fact largely bobbins: The Beatles, Rolling Stones, The Who, Led Zepellin, U2, Bloody Radiohead, Blur, Belle and Sebastian, Kaiser Chiefs, Eminem, Coldplay, Pink Floyd, Elvis Presley, Frank Sinatra, Brian Eno, Genesis, Abba, Bee Gees, The White Stripes, Arcade Fire, Flaming Lips, REM, Blondie, undertones, Verve, The Strokes

Part two: people who are polular, but not protected to the same extent as those in part one, and are or were also largely bobbins: Green Day, the Foo Fighters, The Darkness, Slipknot, Maximo Park, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, Pavement, Rage Against the Machine, 50 Cent, Snow Patrol (the point? Any idea?), Keane (ditto), The Killers, My Chemical Romance, Black Sabbath, Ash, Turin Brakes, Alkaline Trio, The Bravery, Iron Maiden, The Editors, The Hives, The Vines, Catatonia, Guns 'n' Roses, Christina Agullera, Massive Attack, Underworld, Fatboy Slim, AC/DC.

Part three: throwaway pop acts etc who, despite being very popular and/or supposedly credible in some way, are or were still largely bobbins: Celine Dion (first on the list for a reason), Mariah Carey, Kylie Minogue, Gerorge Michael, Phil Collins, Westlife, Jamie Cullum, Wham!, Bananarama, Simply Red, Simple Minds, .

Classical composers who, despite the trend, were largely bobbins: Beethoven (one decent part of one average symphony and what does he get? hundreds of years of respect!), Sullivan, Britten, that guy whose name escapes me, Dvorak.

It seems to me that jazz is the only major musical genre where it's quality that gets respect.

In jazz, the cream rises to the surface, whilst in other genres the pollution just kind of floats there.

Sorry, I don't mean to repetitively quote this, but I need a visual reference.

I'll have to disagree with: The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Rolling Stones, Black Sabbath, REM, & Guns 'n Roses, for a variety of reasons. While some of them may not have been especially pioneering, they were genuine. The shallow glam-rock bands knew what they were, and never pretended to be otherwise. Which is sort of my credo when 'judging' a band - if they're true to themselves, they're alright in my book.

Led Zeppelin?? Jimmy Page is one of the greatest guitarists OF ALL TIME. Plant's vocals are something to contend with in any musical genre. Lyrically, they're fucking brilliant.

The Beatles - one of the very few bands that are obscenely hyped, but well-deserving. The Rolling Stones fall into this category as well, I think - they weren't 'deep,' but they fucking rocked, and that's all they set out to do.

Black Sabbath - I somewhat equate Ozzy with David Lee Roth, in that they both simply embraced the 'rock' lifestyle, and lived it beyond its fullest. They were over the top, but that's what made them appealing. Read Roth's biography sometime, the guy is a fucking classic.

Ah shit, I'll rant more later, my boss is back.
truncated is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|