View Single Post
Old 06.30.2006, 03:09 AM   #52
Jef Mertens
100%
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Geel, Belgium
Posts: 792
Jef Mertens kicks all y'all's assesJef Mertens kicks all y'all's assesJef Mertens kicks all y'all's assesJef Mertens kicks all y'all's assesJef Mertens kicks all y'all's assesJef Mertens kicks all y'all's assesJef Mertens kicks all y'all's assesJef Mertens kicks all y'all's assesJef Mertens kicks all y'all's assesJef Mertens kicks all y'all's assesJef Mertens kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by atari 2600
It's very nice.

It looks like it might've been projected on like a Chuck Close or
that it might be a large print of the picture that's then been color-matched (very well) & painted over for that hyperrealistic effect. It may have been one photo that was gridded off into sheet sized sections even & all of it has now been painted over successfully, & that's why it's painted on wood. something like masonite would have also worked to be sturdy enough to glue down the initial grids of sheet sized pieces of the photograph. Or at the very least, the artist must have employed grids to assist in freehand.

& that's nothing against the artist. i'm just trying to reveal a little about how it was perhaps created. painters have been using whatever forms of technology were available to them for a long, long time.

Well sir,

a projection of the picture was used to position eyes, mouth and nose on the canvas. Projection goes and the rest was done without it.

Do keep in mind that the painting is fairly big.
__________________


Jef Mertens is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|