Quote:
|
Originally Posted by greedrex
huh, you're over reacting.
|
if you say so, it must be true, because everyone knows that message boards have that magick of always being true and accurate and all that. thanks be to telepathy!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by automatic bzooty
too bad for you, !@#$%!, that it's not 1964 and they don't have that fake stereo stuff with the vocals in one speaker and all the other stuff in another...
|
yes! like those old beatles records my mom used to have.
i would kill for that, particularly on "leaky lifeboat", "antenna", and "thunderclap" where the vocals truly irritate me . oh fuck, i forgot "no way"--fork on a plate!
massage the history btw is such a brilliant wonderful fucking song.
steve rules the universe though. fuck! i'd make his channel LOUD!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skuj
Call me crazy, but I have always loved Thurston's singing, and I think it is vastly underrated. He's not Pavoratti, obviously. But like Dylan, his voice perfectly suits/compliments the songs that he sings.
|
crazy.
pavo who? some finnish guy?
my problem with t-bone's voice is that it's kinda nasal-- not as nasal as dylan's but still it's not on par with the rest of the youf's noisical output, which is *fucking supreme*. kim i worship. and lee actually isn't bad!
i think thurston is ok for some songs but sometimes i dont know, he does too much singing. i much prefer when he dry-humps the amps.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheMadcapLaughs
your crazy
|
does he keep him in a cage? or is it a she-crazy?