View Single Post
Old 10.01.2008, 11:50 AM   #12
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,683
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
drawing $700 BILLION in future debt

where do you get the notion that it's $700 billion? people keep tossing that number around, but it might be a more structured plan-- the last i heard started with 250 billion and added gradually more if necessary.

besides, i dont get this notion that we're bailing out "profits for the rich". the rich make profits whatever way the market goes-- the ones who lose big are middle-class investors with retirement plans, mostly-- people who otherwise wouldn't depend on social security to retire. im all for fucking up the parasytes-- but a healthy economy depends on a system for people making reasonable bets. and if we break the system, we ALL go down.

we can spare the system and make the bastards pay-- that's been a component of the bailout package from the get go. nobody is saying let's buy some fuckers their golden parachutes-- nobody. this is a red herring and people shouldn't be repeating it like that. the bailout is not about bailing out the executives and the people who will make a fortune on this-- it's about stabilizing the financial markets, that is all.

--

ps:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/business/21qanda.html
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|