View Single Post
Old 04.09.2008, 08:46 PM   #28
batreleaser
invito al cielo
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 5,155
batreleaser kicks all y'all's assesbatreleaser kicks all y'all's assesbatreleaser kicks all y'all's assesbatreleaser kicks all y'all's assesbatreleaser kicks all y'all's assesbatreleaser kicks all y'all's assesbatreleaser kicks all y'all's assesbatreleaser kicks all y'all's assesbatreleaser kicks all y'all's assesbatreleaser kicks all y'all's assesbatreleaser kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Everyneurotic
i really don't care for pitchfork, just as i don't care about rolling stone. i really just stopped reading it altogether, even thru news section, i eventually find out about what they say from other places.

and it's not because i think i'm cooler than thou or because i disagree with them; my actually problem with pitchfork is a) their function is to be fashion setters and b) their reviews hardly mention the music within the discs they review; really read them, perhaps two lines talk about the music. i just thought "why bother?" really, i don't give too mcuh thought about pitchfork.

original post idea for this thread: pitchfork had credibility?


thank you! i was seriously fucking shocked people jumped on me for dissing pitchfork.
__________________
 


listen to pink reason
batreleaser is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|