View Single Post
Old 02.19.2012, 06:18 PM   #83
E. Noisefield
the end of the ugly
 
E. Noisefield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: In the hearts of men
Posts: 869
E. Noisefield kicks all y'all's assesE. Noisefield kicks all y'all's assesE. Noisefield kicks all y'all's assesE. Noisefield kicks all y'all's assesE. Noisefield kicks all y'all's assesE. Noisefield kicks all y'all's assesE. Noisefield kicks all y'all's assesE. Noisefield kicks all y'all's assesE. Noisefield kicks all y'all's assesE. Noisefield kicks all y'all's assesE. Noisefield kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by demonrail666
You make some great points there, even if I don't necessarily agree with the core comparison which, to be fair you also acknowledge as being a bit of a 'stretch'. I don't want to come across as dismissing SY's post 80s output. Some of it I think is excellent. It just doesn't capture my imagination the way LPs like CiS, BMR, etc, did and, to an extent, still do. I think Murmer got it spot on when describing a certain nightmarish quality to those records. There's a strange bum trip campfire quality to songs like Halloween, Shaking Hell, Brother James, etc, which I think they pretty much abandoned quite early on. I can see why they moved on from that and in many ways respect them even more for doing so but I still think of those songs as the reason why I got into them in the first place and sort of became increasingly distant from them as a band the further they moved on from that template. But that's my problem, ultimately, not theirs.


I definitely understand. When bands shift or change styles it's hard to view their new styles objectively, and not just see the absence of the old style.

But, funnily enough, I think their biggest change, and the one that lead to all the others, was from the twisted nightmare of Sister to the pristine daydream of... well... Daydream lol!
E. Noisefield is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|