Can statues be sexy?
 

YES.



Please post examples, and try to focus more on faces/eyes than on naked bodies and such.

they can be very aesthetically pleasing but sexy is about the brain

Yes.

hell yes!

(that one from the photo is absolutely beautiful, but not particularly sexy for me though. but there are others...)

example: notice the money shot on the nereids w/ the horses between the legs. 100% porn! (esp. the one on the right)





if you cant see a pic here go here:

http://agintern.tamu.edu/Main_Photo_...untain_jpg.jpg

That would be sexy if geese (for that matter, most fowl) didn't scare the hell out of me.

you guys are kinky... I find sexy the eyes of the one I posted, you are taking the thread to a whole another level ;) !

I would have found it offensive if they would have showed the penis of that thing. Bestiality is just wrong.

It's a SWAN, for god's sake.

yep, the head is tilted on one side, it looks like another "big bird" with "more evil" beak.

I don't like this one as much.

^^^
this ain't sexy at all.

Leda looks like a tranny in that one.

Yeah the legs are too muscular.

looks like cristiano ronaldo with a BAD breasts implant.

I'm sorry there isn't much of a focus on face / eyes, but surely Casanova counts.



one for the ladies.... ;)


:p

^^If that's supposed to be phallic, it's not working for me. Frankly, I must say it resembles feces.

Hence why I said "most fowl." This includes swans. I shudder to think what pain a beak could inflict upon such an erogenous body part.

it's not (unless you count the balls??).

it's the ass end of a cat statue in barcelona. :p

but I could see how it's tail could be looked at as phallic from that angle.

the "for the ladies" bit was mostly for my own entertainment.

Can statues be sexy?

Jeff Koons asked this question in some of his early life-size '90s sculpture.
Although, he maintained he was just presenting the everyday ala pop art.