![]() |
Wait.....we are talking about Hillary on this day of all days?
But her emails!! :) |
I mean....fuck me. Trump is POTUS. If Hillary was POTUS and there was a witch-hunt going on that actually turned up a whole lot of witches, then ok, fair game.
But she is not POTUS, and please let me know when she is determined to be guilty of a crime, ok? |
You always know when it is a bad day for Trump: Some people here talk about Hillary. (I admit that I am quite possibly missing the details due to my expanding ignore-list.)
|
Quote:
I don’t have time for Wiki footnotes, so no clue what you are referring to? I shared a link to a story that is accurate and TRUE......not conservative or liberal or democratic......simple as that! Quote:
Why is today the day of all days??? |
Quote:
"mr. neutral" xD Quote:
no sarcasm intended I'M SURE |
Fuck, Bytor. I tried.
--In 2014 and 2015, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that ISIS had set up camp in Mexico; Judicial Watch's claims were picked up by several right-wing news outlets --In 2017, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that taxpayer money went into a billboard which depicted President Donald Trump as a Nazi --In 2013, Judicial Watch claimed that the Department of Justice under the Obama administration organized protests against George Zimmermann after the Trayvon Martin shooting Etc. It's a long list of ethically dubious behavior. A lot of the conspiracy bullshit which circulates around right-wing media (and is eventually thoroughly debunked) starts with Judicial Watch. I'm sure at some point in the recent past they wrote something which made you clench your fists in anger, when in fact the story was simply not true. They don't care about the truth. They just want you pissed. Why anyone would go to them as a source is beyond me. There are a handful of respectable conservative outlets, but they are usually thoughtful and not hysterical, so I guess you wouldn't be interested. |
Quote:
he uses those websites like others use inhalants |
The relevance of linking JudicialWatch is they are the ones who filed the lawsuit that led to the judges rulling. Because of JudicalWatch, Hillary will be testifying under oath......simple as that!
Quote:
|
Quote:
simple as that! :D |
The headline reads:
Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under Oath True. But the same judge threw out about 75% of the rest of their request. And it's two questions. So the headline is, um, misleading. But exciting. I'll give them that. The vast majority of Judicial Watch requests get tossed btw. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh I get it. Bytor has quoted from Pravda again? |
Wow - didn’t realize Tesla and I own real estate in Canada!
As much fun as it is to read, someone should tell Skuj that he is doing it all wrong! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Thank you for confirming the truth and seeing how that’s the only JW story I linked about the Judges ruling, all the other stuff you were referencing doesn’t apply to my post!
Quote:
|
Quote:
Cohen pleaded guilty to EIGHT counts: 5 counts of tax evasion 1 count for making false statement to a financial institution ***these six counts from his New Yourk tax company, not related to TRUMP or his campaign*** 1 count for excessive campaign contribution on October 27th, same date Cohen finalized payment to adult film star Story Daniels due to a non-disclosure agreement she entered into with Donal Trump 1 count making a false statement to congressional campaign ZERO ANYTHING related to Russia, collusion or fixing a campaign!!! The Obama campaign had to pay back millions due to breaking campaign finance laws — MILLIONS!! So again I ask, where-O-where are the charges coming from? Let us remember those who have been convicted or pleaded guilty since Trump became POTUS: -- Trump's personal attorney -- Trump's former campaign chairman -- Trump's former WH national security adviser -- Trump's former campaign adviser -- Trump's former deputy campaign chairman And after all of this, NOT ONE thing connecting any of them to collusion, hacking or anything else Muller has been fishing for! 2015: No Collusion 2016: No Collusion 2017: No Collusion 2018: No Collusion SIMPLE AS THAT!!! |
@evollove
tell me more about sherrod brown? i just read this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...199_story.html george will of all people.. |
lol bytor
|
I skimmed Will and he made some good points. Not sure what info you want.
He's very pro-worker. Progressive, but in a practical way. Smart as fuck, but not obnoxious. He has sloppy hair and a gruff voice, and doesn't come off as an elitist. Just a regular dude. Women seem to love him. About 20 years ago, he had an ugly divorce. He may have pushed his ex-wife, who pressed charges, then dropped them. He and the ex are friends now, and she endorses him all the time. Still, the Trumpian fuck he ran against used that. Didn't get a lot of traction, but someone like Trump might make it a huge deal and his lemmings might buy it. That's the only hiccup. Otherwise, yeah. He could swing a few red states to blue and take the whole thing. It's quite likely. |
Is it possible that Mueller could reach out to Mrs NRA Russia Spy Chick?
I've said it before, but recent news/sentencings revolve around the silly little matter of paying off women. Mueller has yet to reveal his Russia cards. My popcorn is ready. |
Talking to a guy who was calling Mika Berzinskis “ butt boy” comment “ REAL anti gay discrimination.”....nah, not the quite a few gays and non binaries I know...
So I looked up some trumpie actions, goddawful lot, fuck!! What they do have a problem with is the ACTIONS of religious and trumpie folks trying to screw them over.... https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/...tq-anniversary https://www.glaad.org/tap/donald-trump |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth