![]() |
Quote:
I'll explain it to you because maybe you would care: - Women don't go out to libraries to have cunts staring at them and talking about them on the internet. - What was even more worrying was the actual lamenting as to why he couldn't take photos of people who would be unaware of it and post them so that they could be unwillingly objectified on the internet without their consent. - There are women on this board (not many now, and you can see why) who deserve to be respected and feel like this is a welcoming place for them. I can only think of 2 or 3 female posters now (including me) among all the posters here. Sure you would say there aren't many people posting now, but how many of them are male vs. female? How many women have posted here and or simply lurk? I know because I remember getting a lot of messages about this. Even if one of them wanted to complain about anything, they wouldn't because they've seen the way I've been treated for doing so. And that's what I've been told by quite a few of them. - People don't appreciate having their ethnicity and background talked about as a commodity for other people's erotic pleasure. They are human beings, individuals and their ethnicity is not a brand. Indian women, for instance, already take enough shit to have to deal with western people fetichizing their features. I can't be any clearer than that. |
Quote:
It should matter to people if other people tell them something that they're doing makes them feel uncomfortable. It should matter to them that many girls don't feel welcome here. It should call for some self-assessment if some people are acting like this is their space, not a space they share with people, people from all around the world, including women of certain ethnicities or nationalities that may find it very offensive. I don't think he was "exaggerating", he said he wouldn't do that because it wasn't permitted but expressed his willingness to do so. We don't get to decide what other people may find offensive or uncomfortable. You're creating a male-dominated environment in which very few people raised their voices against a bunch of males ganging up against a woman from simply raising her voice against something she doesn't find ok. And when that doesn't work to silence me, the attacks on my character begin. This is the classist strategy of the privileged. That is worrying, especially because it's a representation of how things are in the real world. I'm not asking people to change their entire lives, but to have some respect for me and other girls who are or may want to be posting here. I don't think I have to remind you that SY is very popular among girls because of Kim Gordon's lyrics about women issues. The strategy works because any girl reading this will be afraid of being treated the same way as I have. If they want to act like that, like they own the space and it doesn't matter what anybody feels, if it's not important for them to listen, I can only say it's really sad and it makes me worry about women in their "real" lives. |
On the other hand, you're probably right that Rob didn't mean anything much by it, because it's no big deal in his opinion. However, intent is not may or may not offend people, as we don't always realize how deeply embedded our prejudices are. If somebody calls it, chances are they're probably right. The only nice way to do it is to try and respect people's feelings, not to use your already-privileged position to try and make them shut up so you can carry on without reconsidering anything.
|
Quote:
This is the big thing with the situation - if someone had said, in an off-hand way, that black people were stupid, they'd be shouted down without hesitation. Or it'd be taken as a sort of Internet ironic thing. When it comes to sexism, not only is it entirely normal, the interrogation of same is seen as abnormal. Many calls to 'chill'. Lots of people saying knox 'misinterpreted' the first and subsequent posts. Nothing was misinterpreted - knox is interrogating bizarre and unpleasant behaviour and getting shouted down because that behaviour is entirely 'normal'. She's also being much more chilled than I think a lot of you realise. My partner was utterly livid when she read this thread. |
for the record knox (if you read this i don't know), i am not against you criticizing the objectification and stereotyping of people based on gender, nationality, etc. i actually was protesting a stupid racist joke here the other day. i'm not saying this to justify that i'm some sort of saint, i'm just saying it so that the direction of my attacks against you isn't conflated with attacks against your general cause.
i'm just clarifying here because you seem to think (or imply) that i'm against fairness, that i'm for the male supremacy. i'm not. i'm against the tyranny of self-appointed ayatollahs, but that's another story. while i didn't find rob's initial post appealing, the one that came across as creepy (to me anyway) was bytor's request for photos. now the thing is-- i actually support discussing and questioning those things. i was actually going to chime in, in my own fashion, but then when i looked again things had gone elsewhere. where i come in to fight you is in your approach that accomplishes nothing but alienate people. yes, you may feel morally superior implying that rob is an enabler of rape, you may feel like a martyr because nobody listens to you, but really, if your goal is social change, insulting people for crimes they didn't commit will not achieve that. the very act of being put on trial will cause them to "not listen" as you complain. people will default to the defensive stance. now, ironically enough, that's the very same approach i take towards you, namely, i call you stupid and insane while i try to convince you to be smarter and saner-- and obviously it backfires. so i'm not practicing what i'm preaching. the difference though is that i'm not trying to educate like you say you do-- i'm just fighting. the only reason i'm fighting you on this is because you come into the thread swinging a battleaxe in all directions, screaming bloody murder, and i look and say "hey, is this a private fight, or can anyone join?". but just so you know, i'll repeat-- i'm not fighting for sexism and objectification, i'm just fighting against pigheadedness, unfocused rage, overreaching accusations, poor arguments, and silliness such as "stop doing what you do because i say so." there are better arguments against sexism and objectification than "because i say so, you filthy man." why i fight, you might ask? because i like to fight, and you're offering the occasion. and i suspect the same is whith everyone who isn't "listening" to you-- they are trying, but you keep calling them names instead. smooth move! |
Quote:
That's a recurring thought I have, imagine this scenario with race and you would have an army of outraged people. But because sexism is totally naturalized, they are not even embarassed of what they've been doing. But I won't even expect anybody to quote or reply to you. Despite the fact there has been some arrogant attempts to pretend this was actually an intellectual debate, none of that was genuine. It quickly descends to name calling and just blatant assholism. The behaviour here makes me actually worry about real life. ![]() |
Quote:
http://sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthr...6857&page=1863 i didn't pursue self-proclaimed feminist floatingslowly for saying that girl was "a man" because everything is a joke to him anyway |
Quote:
Honestly, honestly, honestly. You get told off by some men who shame you for being a total cunt and you change your tone completely. That's because you are a coward. You are a coward and the way you've treated me more than once makes me actually worry about the women in your life, because you seem to think it's ok to use exaggerated aggresion and verbal abuse against a woman, and you have no problem rubbing your privilege on someone for your own selfish purposes. You can't turn back now because that side of you has been clearly exposed. I don't even expect you to truly be ashamed of yourself, you're just being political because now other man are watching. That's classic behaviour and it's the behaviour of a coward. |
Quote:
see, that's exactly what i'm talking about, haa haaa haa. you're proving my point. the unfocused rage, the questioning of motives, the overreaching accusations-- that's the stuff of madness, stupidity, and rotgut drink. i'll keep it going, if you're game. do you need a coffee? |
i think i miss laila. she was cool but a girl and muslim so nobody was very nice
|
Quote:
Wow. Now we're trying to avoid judgement by trying to throw someone under the bus. A whole new low. Unfortunately for you, floatingslowly is lovely and reacts very well to criticism, and has shown his opinions here. I've never seen him persecuting a woman in a rude, aggressive and insulting way. If he ever does, I'll be sure to tell him off. |
Quote:
im not throwing anyone under a bus, you're just a coward afraid to lose a supporter when you're about to lose completely yes, coward, i said coward. only brave when drunk. |
Quote:
You have directed sexist insults and attacks towards me before. You have been blacklisted because I take these things very seriously. Don't even try to play this game in which you continue to attack my character about things you don't even know. Nobody is going to fall for it, it's not funny and it's making you look worse. You started this because I once told you I was drunk. So we all get that you're sexist enough to think women shouldn't drink, so let's move on. I'm not especulating about what you do for fun, because that doesn't define your character. I'm commenting on the attitude you've been displaying here, once again. And it's the attitude of a coward. |
there's a lot of women i really don't like but i wouldn't get much out of calling them a drunk or coward more than a hundred times. like 5 times is already pretty excessive
|
Quote:
When a man has no problem directly name calling and being excessively aggresive towards a woman, that's a big red flag. |
Quote:
since to you everything is sexist, i suppose i have Quote:
blacklisted? that's racist! Quote:
why not? you attack the character of everyone who disagrees with you. do you have the monopoly on this? Quote:
i don't know, i think it's pretty evident that you're part-deranged Quote:
i started this because the reason i mentioned above Quote:
lololololol. i think people who react poorly to drink should drink. i had a male highschool friend who would get into fights every time he drank. so i stopped drinking with him. angry drunks are awful. Quote:
you just speculated that i think women shouldn't drink, which is hilarious Quote:
why is it cowardly to argue unfairly with someone who is using unfair arguments? i don't get it. do you get a special dispensation to be an asshole? i hope you don't think being a woman gives you the right to be an asshole, because that would be sexist, and a lie. |
Quote:
I don't remember her... I do remember some nice girls here. |
While she made some good points, some of which have been brought up on this forum more than twice previously, and certainly I have discussed and agreed on with other women in my life many times in the past, including my sisters, I still find knox insufferably patronising when she brings them forward to her internet audience. For instance, it made me chuckle that she even tried to suggest on this thread that I have an insensitive attitude towards gay-bashing (if I read that correctly). That's not the first time she ridiculously suggested I am insensitive to gender issues either. I'm all for being aggressive on subjects such as these, but if you end up alienating potential recruits to your cause, or worse still, you push away people already converted from engaging in any discussion with you because of your attitude, thus making them discuss those issues with people they'll find more engaging, surely it shouldn't come as a surprise if you are met with an indifferent or antagonist attitude from your regular bunch of idiotic rape-apologists and all-male internet acrobats, who will obviously enter the discussion with a well-worded reply to cover their tracks.
|
...
|
she's not patronising you.
it's called matronising. lol |
It shouldn't be important what you think about ME, if you like how I sound, if my methods are pleasing to anybody or what I do in my personal life. It shouldn't matter at all because it isn't about ME.
And like I said previously many times, if you're an asshole to me, I'm an asshole back. That's my right to fight back. And I also said I'm pretty fucking derranged, so I'm not sure why some feel the need to repeat it as if everybody doesn't know. None of that makes my points less valid. However, paying more attention to HOW something's being said than to WHAT is being said is a cop-out. It's simply an excuse. |
Quote:
you make it all about you though, is the problem Quote:
same here! but it also applies when you're an asshole to my friends. Quote:
because the deranged part obfuscates your serious/important arguments Quote:
it obfuscates them, to the point of oblivion Quote:
no, it's not an excuse when your shots backfire and when you turn people away from a good idea |
my computer just told me it's 6pm so i gotta go but i hope everyone gets better, and i don't mean that sarcastically
|
Quote:
or perhaps it provides you with the perfect excuse? you already came here attacking me, i react then you get your excuse and your kicks. i don't have to play the nice, decent, educational personal to anyone who enjoys being an ass. you're the guy who refused to keep photos of objectified women in one thread, even if there were quite a few girls asking for that and everyone else agreed it'd be a good solution for everyone. i haven't forgotten that. so you see, i still have a great memory! oh, and, by the way, alcoholism is a terrible disease. so even if your stupid remarks about me struggling with alcohol were true, you'd be a jerk just the same. |
Quote:
someone's intelligence is not determined by gender. |
Quote:
Please, I said a million times. This isn't a welcoming environment for women. They are not posting here. If it takes getting people pissed off to deal with that, be it. Nobody would even have to be pissed off if they simply had the common decency to do some self-assessement when someone makes a criticism. |
Quote:
what? none of that makes any sense. |
The odd bits I've read of this thread made me feel guilty about fuck all, btw.
|
as a brainwashed eastern filth i want to thank knox for being such a damn good communist.
she thinks people are more important than advertising and everybody is equal. an attitude of komradery, i'm impressed. if she ever wants to stop lying about not being red to core i'll buy her some earings that look like hammers |
Quote:
knox, what happened to the closure? Listen. Nobody here disagrees with any of the 37 separate points you've made on this thread through several thousand words. Alas, you have been arguing with yourself, working up your emotions, and shifting the entire tone of the discussion entirely on your own. Rob made a mistake. You corrected it like 20 pages ago. So why the drag out? Why the discussion of rape or gender bias/discrimination? Your initial point was that Rob's post reflected what you felt as objectification and sexism, I feel you on that for real but check it out, you "simply raised your voice" on that and we heard you. So why all this other Feminine Mystique Revisted tirades? See, SYG isn't just your blog either, as you said, it is a public space. You are free to share your thoughts on feminism, the situation of women in our society, and the problems they face, and we are all free as men and women to discuss them with you. But your discussion was not a conversation, it was strictly an accusation, and what is worse, entirely unfounded. Rob does post sexist things here, and we have all called him out over the years, as have many of us on many instances of these things. However, Rob is not a rapist, Rob doesn't support the glass ceiling or gender gap or classism in our society. Shit. Stop having a hyperbolic argument with strawmen of your own creations. If you would like to have a calm, intelligent discussion about women's issues, we in the SYG community would definitely love the refreshing chance of pace, but please, don't suddenly make it into some super apocalypse, its not. The majority of people in my life are all women. Trust me, I get you. But you really don't get some of us if you seriously believe half of what you have accused folks of here. Discussing major problems in our society is one thing, wrongly accusing people of being complicit with those evils is another matter entirely :/ |
Quote:
not showing you my passport or greencard homie, fucc the i.n.s. |
It is quite telling how none of you have replied to my point or Glice's point.
If youre so concerned with the "Ideas" being proffered and are SO not just arguing with Knox because she's a girl, why doesnt anyone want to argue the point with someone who also has a dick? |
whoah..i thought this must have been an old thread.
i havent read it yet. i can tell what it is about. i read the first few entries. my first reaction was that the title 'so many ladies' didnt strike me well. perhaps because it was obvious that it was going to be about sex. i think that title bothered me more than the 1st post of Rob. the next thing that i always do it such cases, is that i put myself in the other's shoes. what if i or what do i do when i speak about men like that. 'oh wow, at my gym the analogy of attractive men is astonishing'. am i wrong too? am i being sexist as well? is it more acceptable when women talk like that about men like that? and why. then all becomes bit blurry, but what is a fact, is that the way women talk about men isnt that degrading. perhaps its our way of expressing, but def society is to blame. i will read this thread when i have time for this. sorry. |
if someone had the time:
take the hot girls vs hot men threads and find the % of porn looking pics in both. and how male and females have chosen the pics. |
Quote:
Just in case this got missed in all the excitement. |
I like this one too:
Quote:
|
And this one:
Quote:
|
Oh, Schroedinger's rapist! That's a great one:
http://kateharding.net/2009/10/08/gu...t-being-maced/ Note the full link reads 'a guy's guide to approaching a stranger without being maced'. Sadly, the maced bit doesn't happen often enough. |
And I was thinking last night - have you noticed that there's two subjects which have got knox angry on this forum? Anything to do with feminism and gun control. That's because they're important, and they're both dealt with (by and large) in a fairly off-hand, dismissive way here.
|
![]() Here's a graphic. A horrible, horrible graphic. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth